Comments on: Manny Pacquiao v Tim Bradley And Other Contoversial Decisions That Dragged Boxing Into The Gutter

By: S

Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:56:26 +0000

Anyone who takes the corrupt shambles that is boxing seriously needs their head looking at.

By: Frank

Frank — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:39:05 +0000

This disgrace needs to be overturned: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDZES3eHJ-Y

By: Lemay

Lemay — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:40:16 +0000

For Mickie
Its clear to the public that boxing association is corrupted which is why people rather watch UFC rather than a beautifull technical boxing match, and when it comes to the job example you posted. There is nothing wrong with the promotion as long as you do not get promoted by putting your co-workers down.

By: Lemay

Lemay — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:29:14 +0000

Ok Mikie…
I disagree to the fact that the desicion was not his fault. Bradley had to be in it. Other wise how else would you explain the text message he sent with the rematch poster before the first fight even occured. If Pacquiao would’ve won, there would be absolutely no point of even thinking about a rematch because Manny Pacquiao has beaten better fighters than Bradley would ever be.

By: Dan

Dan — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:29:02 +0000

One wonders why he has not queried the judgement with the higher powers of boxing…..even he has said everyone knows he was screwed. On to the UFC thing-one champion per weight division brings more respectability and prestige.

By: Warrior

Warrior — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:24:44 +0000

Roger Mayweather (trainer and uncle of floyd mayweather) tweets that he hates Manny Pacquioa but the decision was unfair and Pacquioa got robbed. He further says, “Pacquiao beat the crap out of Bradely.” However, Duane ford said, “Bradely gave Pacquiao a boxing lesson.” Wow, an independent investigation needs to investigate these three judges, including Bob Arum.

By: Warrior

Warrior — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:20:58 +0000

Bradley, at most, won 2 round. The most insane and worst decisions ever.

By: Warrior

Warrior — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:19:49 +0000

51 out of 54 Journalists scored for Manny Pacquioa winning the fight. My question is are 3 journalists of the 54 on the same boat as the 3 paid judges? Unfortunately, they didn’t get paid (under the table) as the 3 judges (thieves), but their minds were predetermined as well. Corrupted!!!

By: Mikie

Mikie — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:46:52 +0000

The decision is not bradleys fault. he shouldnt have to return anything. Fuck the public. He trained his ass off and showed up to work. If u get a raise at work that is way more than you deserve, you wouldnt give that shit back. Boxing assoc is the problem

By: Lemay

Lemay — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:18:32 +0000

Obviously this was a one sided fight to Pacquiao. We are handling this w/ too much respect for a clear scam to the public. The judges were clearly paid, even judge Roth who scored towards Pacquiao. This was all a set up to make look real. How could you even think Bradley won after Paquiao landed 100 punches more than him, Bradley lost that fight before the 9th round. If Bradley wants the respect of the public he should return the belt & request a REMATCH to proof he could beat Pacquiao, that way maybe the fans will actually buy the rematch. Bradeley should be ashamed that even accepted such belt, he said it himself he lost. Texting the rematch poster before the first fight even started “come on”. Your lucky Paquiao is into God now.