Sabotage Times, We can't Concentrate so Why Should You?Sabotage Times, We can't Concentrate so Why Should You?


Ferguson Verdict: Another State-Sponsored Murder Of A Black Man

by Ian Hough
25 November 2014 34 Comments

Here's how the state's decision that Michael Brown was at fault for his own murder at the hands of the police triggered the worst night of rioting yet in the Missouri city...

Ferguson_Day_6,_Picture_44

[Img via]

This was it; The Verdict. Eyes down, look in. Michael Brown vs. The Man. Who would win this dark political game in America’s heartland? A young man was dead. A policeman was still out there, clearly free as Elsa the Lion, seconds before the verdict was announced.

Fuck, this was better than the election. Any election; a nation salivating over the final status of a teenager’s corpse, hoping his murderer would be brought to justice (despite the fact Officer Darren Wilson was clearly frolicking somewhere very free), yet secretly wanting riots and shootings and deaths and lootings and all-out fucking anarchy because we’re all boring cunts who have mortgages and jobs and kids and are basically slaves looking for escape.

At Zero Hour out he came: Robert McCulloch, Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri. A bloke who sounds suspiciously like Doug Stanhope, though I suspect the powers-that-be were hoping for more of a Clint Eastwood effect…nah, it was Doug Stanhope, in glasses, strangely dyed grey hair and a suit, rendered senseless by the CIA in an MKULTRA funk.
Before the verdict was delivered, I tweeted it from a Reddit source that turned out to be true: NO INDICTMENT. Another reason why you should follow Reddit Conspiracy on Twitter.

At this point, I was hoping for a massive off between the Klan and gang-bangers in arse-hanger jeans and hi-top “sneakers”, waves of black lads lobbing petrol-bomb at retreating freaks in pointy ghost hats, up and down the streets of St. Louis and Ferguson…it would have provided some hysterical relief from the reality we face here in the States, where martial law and false flag attacks are always looming.

As Stanhope began his grating insult, Twitter descended into carnal bloodlust, like a plane undecided whether to aim at JFK or MLK or CNN or Barry Soetoro, while the KKK battles in the cockpit with the Nation of Islam to determine who gets to drive. All the hipsters and rebels were turbo-tweeting their sympathy for anyone with pigment, while I was opening multiple bottles of 9% Double IPA and lining them up on my desk in anticipation of mayhem and tear gas.

 

It looked bad for the “Brown Family” immediately, as Stanhope started to question “eyewitness” (code for black people) accounts. Stanhope began drilling down hard on “eyewitness” credibility, saying that black people looking at an angelic cop punishing a savage criminal hallucinated an innocent young black man being needlessly shot to death by a cowardly white policeman who was clearly out of his depth. They were all insane. Making it up.

Stanhope went on to hoarsely describe the hours upon hours of witness testimony, including thousands of hours and hundreds of photographs and a lot of grey air claiming the jury are the “only people” who have heard and digested all fourteen billion witness testimonies, a gargantuan feat that took over 1.06 light years.

Could this jury process it? Stanhope described their task as a “Monumental responsibility”…

He said the Grand Jurors “gave up their lives” to do this, even though their term was up in September. Awww, poor luvs, they gave their LIVES. They are the true martyrs in this case, apparently.

The alleged diversity of the grand jury encompassed age, income, retired/working, neighbourhood, occupation, etc. Racial split was nine whites / three blacks, according to someone who knows. There weren’t many, if any, African-Americans in the press seats following Stanhope’s statement either.

The “stealing at the market” incident, in which Brown was described in “red hat, yellow socks, khaki shorts” and grabbing cigarillos without paying, was trotted out. Someone in the store called the police; not the proprietor, someone else.
According to the narrative, Officer Wilson encountered Brown and his companion in the middle of the street. Wilson asked them to move to the side, while noticing the yellow socks. An altercation occurred and two shots were fired from within the vehicle.

Officer Wilson fired 12 rounds.

The thumb shot was the first shot, the top of head was probably the last. I kept expecting McCulloch to take a swig of beer from a bottle, a la his comedic alter, but the mask was tight and the Illuminati pissed from the pyramid’s pinnacle.

They concluded that a perfectly healthy teenager just upped and died for perfectly innocent reasons.

Morbidly, I started to wonder if I was missing any riot footage on other channels. This Stanhope clown faked his opinion on the sad loss of Michael Brown, but said it had opened the dialogue, which I found very difficult to understand what the fuck that even meant.

Stanhope said that Brown came at Officer Wilson “at a full charge”. Officer Wilson stopped shooting when Michael stopped “charging”, but started shooting again when Michael charged again. What a hero.

Ultimately, this cunt needs striking by lightning – black lightning – becoming a frazzled scrap of radioactive bacon on the road to Sodom and Gomorrah. Just my opinion.

At a certain point it became evident that Stanhope had come into his own, having realized there were no petrol bombs, or truly difficult questions, coming his way. He repeated how sad it was, the pain that goes along with that loss, that Michael Brown’s parents must feel, but as tragic as it is, it was not a case where charges should be filed. What a fucking surprise, you dirty shameless psychopathic cunt.

“No police officer should be put in that position,” he told us. What this means is that Michael Brown was to blame for being shot 12 times until he died, and that police should never be challenged in any way whatsoever.

The looting had already started before Stanhope had finished his routine.

CNN and Co. delighted in showing us footage of young black men assaulting a police car, as officers moved in with shotguns cocked, a bizarre intimacy and clarity to the film.

And then the President.

Obama looked deflated, a man drained of all fuel. He almost insisted that he didn’t believe this particular case was one of discrimination, but managed to get it together. Poor demented corrupt bastard. He did play the “I’m black and I’m President” card, to claim anyone causing trouble tonight was using the death of Mike Brown as an excuse, but in Ferguson the streets were billowing with smoke and the noises were ugly. And Barry Soetoro could be excused for weeping in private.

All week they’ve been bringing in the hardballers. Militarized experts bent on making a point. And all along, the mainstream was distracting us with talk of the Ku Klux Klan.

Officer Wilson sent a *gasp* letter, to thank everyone who’d supported him through his nightmare.

Wilson cried at his own inconvenience, as Michael Brown’s parents were devastated by this latest state-sponsored murder of a black man. The dirty fucker even mentioned a fund where people can send money. This echoes other “tragedies” where vile weasels saw the opportunity to make some coin off the emotions of morons.

And that’s it: We leave you with news channels wanking over a car on fire.

If you like it, Pass it on

image descriptionCOMMENTS

Harry 5:19 pm, 25-Nov-2014

Good work.

JimdW 5:32 pm, 25-Nov-2014

#ferguson appears to blocked on twitter.

myleftboot 5:52 pm, 25-Nov-2014

The worst thing is, we expected the murderer to get off Scott free, you were hardly nostradamus. The only thing that has changed since Rodney King is the whole world knows that it is a corrupt racist system, and they still think they can shoot kids for the skimpiest of reasons, wearing yellow socks this time, a hoodie was Trayvon Martins cause of death apparently. Maybe black Americans should always walk around stark bollock naked with their hands up

Doesn't matter 11:15 pm, 25-Nov-2014

Fucking disgraceful, which weapon was the Copper caring? Some semi Automatic or did he need to reload? Either way 2 shots at most that hit would've done the job. UK firearms lads are trained to go for the chest which admittedly won't always be possible but 12 slugs in any situation is overkill and the bloke is nothing short of a murderer and a nasty one at that. Cunt, I hope he finds himself abducted and put infront of some "Downtown Court".

John 2:05 am, 26-Nov-2014

Repeat after me....No one to blame but ourselves.... No one to blame but ourselves....

Vince 2:39 pm, 26-Nov-2014

The definition of murder: the unlawful killing, with malice aforethought, of another human. Could you please show me any evidence that shows officer Wilson "murdered" Michael Brown? In fact, could anyone who's jumped on the outraged-bandwagon show me any evidence that points to officer Wilson being guilty? This is another classic case, just like the Zimmerman case, where mainstream media cares more about a good old fashioned "big bad whitey keeping down the poor, innocent blacks"-story than they care about the facts. All the evidence and documents about the case have been released. Yet, I'm willing to bet 99% of people "outraged" by the Ferguson verdict haven't taken the time to read a single fucking paragraph of it. Because if they had, they'd realise this so-called injustice and all the outrage surrounding it, is based entirely on lies, manipulation and racism against whites. I dare anyone to prove me wrong using facts, not feelings and hearsay.

Vince 3:17 pm, 26-Nov-2014

“Stanhope began drilling down hard on “eyewitness” credibility, saying that black people looking at an angelic cop punishing a savage criminal hallucinated an innocent young black man being needlessly shot to death by a cowardly white policeman who was clearly out of his depth. They were all insane. Making it up.” Some of the eyewitnesses did, in fact, make things up. If you had done any research, you would know this. You would also know they have admitted to making things up. You can find a good example of here, pages 100 through 125: http://www.scribd.com/doc/248129888/Grand-Jury-Transcript-October-16-2014

Simon Ross 5:57 pm, 26-Nov-2014

WOW..You really haven't read any of the evidence presented to the Grand Jury have you ? I would suggest you go here http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/11/25/us/evidence-released-in-michael-brown-case.html?_r=0 and actually learn the facts of the case prior to posting a totally biased article on here.

Andy 6:18 pm, 26-Nov-2014

Why all the rioting? Why didn't they just tell everyone how very angry they were via twitter? Sorted.

Vince 6:20 pm, 26-Nov-2014

Of course they haven't, Simon. They do not care about the truth. They do not care about the facts. They do not care about justice. All they care about is pushing their own agenda, capitalising on tragic events to spread their propaganda. It's sickening, but sadly, one of their most used tactics.

Simon Ross 6:34 pm, 26-Nov-2014

@Vince Unfortunately very true :-( While I enjoy ST most of the time, ill informed, badly written articles like this one actively hurt the site in my opinion. Yes, there is a debate to be had into the death of Michael Brown, but make it a rational debate which includes the facts of the case, not some over hysterical rant !

Ian Hough (@IanBHough) 4:54 am, 27-Nov-2014

You are referring me to "official" narratives in this case without realizing that all official narratives are crafted by those responsible for damage limitation on behalf of the murderer. As for eyewitnesses lying, they didn't all lie, and Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them are infinitely more pervasive than the horrified friends and relatives of this young man. A couple of leg shots would have stopped him, but the trend of policemen shitting their pants and going for the kill continues... Oh, and Andy...if only we were all as well connected and "sorted" as you, you fucking snivelling cunt.

Vince 12:32 pm, 27-Nov-2014

Tinfoil hat alert. What about all the (black) eyewitnesses who've risked their lives telling the truth? Bet they're government agents, right?

Sharydufc 12:43 pm, 27-Nov-2014

Always the same. Apologists, conspiracy theorists, its all opinion bias using "facts" to fit their world view. Regardless of who said what or walked towards whomever. A grown man, paid to keep the community safe, fired 12 bullets in to an unarmed teenager and will face no punishment for it. Instead of regarding it as a failing in a "modernised" society, we are using it as an excuse to air our political opinions. @Vince - you should hang your head in shame with your "racism against whites rant". You and your UKIP ilk will ruin this fucking country.

Vince 1:54 pm, 27-Nov-2014

Hahaha. Deary me, the left really is getting desperate. So, let me get this straight, because I took the facts, (black) eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence into consideration before forming my opinion, I'm suddenly an apologist and UKIP supporter? You couldn't make it up. What exactly has UKIP got to do with this? And how exactly am I ruining the country by stating the facts and calling out a protest for what it really is: another case of an incident being exploited by playing the race and victim card? If you can't see that, you're an imbecile. I ask you this: how much of an uproar would this case have caused if the policeman had been black and the teenager white? None whatsoever. There's your racism. Anyway, as I said in a previous comment, if you can find me any evidence at all that suggests the policeman who shot Michael Brown deserves to be punished, let me know, I'd be genuinely interested. I do believe there are more pressing matters the black community in the U.S. could protest and be angry about. White policemen doing their job isn't one of them. Meanwhile, I'll hold my head up high, secure in the knowledge I can be proud of myself for not blindly following the narrative the mainstream media want me to follow.

Simon Ross 2:59 pm, 27-Nov-2014

@Ian Hough. And your evidence for this is ? By all means, lets discuss the rights or wrongs of the case, but to disregard forensic and eyewitness evidence is just plain immature ! This should not be about a white cop shooting a black man, it should be asking the question if the police officer involved followed his training and SOP. If he did, then there is no charge, if he didn't then he deserves to be jailed. If a white youth had acted in the same way, would you honestly be making the same claims ?

Andy 4:04 pm, 27-Nov-2014

@IanHough - bit twitchy aren't we?What's wrong, not everyone agreeing with you? Feeling a bit oppressed are we? Manc twat.

Ian Hough (@IanBHough) 5:38 pm, 27-Nov-2014

Simon, you mentioned standard operating procedure, and that is the reason this cunt should have been indicted. He basically shit bricks and went for the head shot, like so many other coppers here do these days, and not just on blacks. You ask for evidence...isn't a body enough evidence for you?

Simon Ross 7:03 pm, 27-Nov-2014

@Ian Hough. A body is a victim, it is not on it's own evidence of an illegal act. That why adults examine the evidence leading up to, during and after the event to understand WHY the incident happened. Was the officer involved 'shitting bricks', of course he was, as both you and I would be faced with a 6'4" 280lbs aggressive robbery suspect regardless of the colour of their skin !

Ian Hough (@IanBHough) 7:17 pm, 27-Nov-2014

I don't fucking shit bricks son. I shit pricks. Pricks like you after I've had 'em for brekkeh. Innit.

Simon Ross 6:48 pm, 28-Nov-2014

@Ian Hough...Think you just terminated any limited credibility you had with your last comment sonny !

Ian Hough (@IanBHough) 9:39 pm, 28-Nov-2014

Don't say "sonny", son, say "son". It's better.

Vince 10:59 pm, 28-Nov-2014

Proper embarrassing stuff there, Ian. If you're actually getting paid by SabotageTimes, you should be done for theft.

Ian Hough (@IanBHough) 12:45 am, 29-Nov-2014

Write summet yerself then, Vince...which I'm sure is your real name, son, lad, man, lad, pal, Beatle.

Vince 1:53 am, 29-Nov-2014

Am I allowed to base my article on facts? And is it okay not to follow mainstream media's narrative? If so, I might give it a go.

Simon Ross 8:41 am, 29-Nov-2014

@Ian Hough...When you mature enough to write coherent articles on serious subjects without throwing the toys out of your pram when people disagree with your highly biased view of events, then you may get treated like an adult. Until then ...

Harry Paterson 7:27 am, 3-Dec-2014

Good piece and well-written. As for its detractors, they talk bollocks. I'll see your challenge, Vince, and raise you this... http://kansasexposed.org/2014/11/29/ku-journalism-major-shreds-case-against-mike-brown/

Ian Hough (@IanBHough) 2:47 am, 4-Dec-2014

And today in NYC we have yet another cunt getting away with murder. I suppose the "evidence" indicates the gang of scum who did him in were also just doing their job. What makes me laugh is how everyone thinks these body cameras will change everything....

Vince 1:07 pm, 5-Dec-2014

Ian, Eric Garner's death (the NYC case) was a tragedy. He wasn't being violent, the policeman performed an illegal movement (chokehold) on him and it ended up with Garner dying. Tragic, pointless and disgusting. And there's video evidence of it from start to finish. Why the copper didn't get indicted remains a mystery for me. But these two cases are incomparable. If you can't see that, I don't really see the point in any further debate.

Vince 1:14 pm, 5-Dec-2014

Harry, I thought you'd come to the defence of your fellow left-wing lunatic and conspiracy theorist! However, you'll have to do better than come out with your usual mantra of "those who don't agree with me talk bollocks". As for linking me to an article on an incredibly biased site, how is that supposed to be a "raise"? I have hundreds of documents proving my point.. and you link me to an article written by a biased journalist? Stay clear of poker, fella.

Harry Paterson 8:34 pm, 5-Dec-2014

Er, because the piece points out with *facts* backed up by secondary sources, there for you to check, all the complete bollocks quoted by you above! Can you not read? For the record I'm shit-hot at poker. Been playing since 1983 - waaaay before it became trendy - and I reckon I could take your ass nae bother ;-) In conclusion, I'd love to see these "hundreds of documents" you have. Can you post them somewhere? Or email me them? Or is it just more bollocks?

Vince 12:13 pm, 6-Dec-2014

Well, if *you* could read, you'd realise I've already put up a link to the documents a few comments above. Anyway, here's another link to the full Grand Jury Documents. Have fun finding out you are the one spouting bollocks. http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2014/11/us/ferguson-grand-jury-docs/

Harry Paterson 10:04 am, 7-Dec-2014

Still not getting it, are you, son? Those are the self-same documents examined by the journo in the link I posted and comprehensively debunked. I was expecting fresh insight, new information.

Vince 11:04 am, 8-Dec-2014

Yes, I'm the one not getting it. Of course. How could you be wrong? After all, you have linked me to a biased site with a handful of claims on it, most of which don't change the situation in the slightest. Have you actually read any of the so-called "debunking"? At least half of them, even if true, don't change the situation at all. You can debunk most of her "debunks" by going through the official documents. Just tell me why several African Americans would risk their life by talking to the police, telling them what they saw, which, surprisingly correlates with Darren Wilson's version of the events, unlike the witnesses who's version of the events didn't and later admitted lying to the police. Just face it, this case is the wrong one to push your agenda. Better luck next time. Oh and good on you for helping the African American community, I'm sure they'll really benefit from being put in the victim bracket for no reason, again.

Leave a comment

1