West Ham? AC Milan? Who Cares? Liverpool Just Need To Shift Andy Carroll
He might have restored his reputation with some good work at Euro 2012, but the big fella will never fit in with a tiki-taka approach and should be flogged to the highest bidder...

West Ham and AC Milan have been linked. Will Liverpool get rid of Andy Carroll?
Spain’s success at this year’s European Champions served as a timely reminder of just how devastating the tiki-taka style of play can be when it is executed perfectly, and Liverpool fans will no doubt be hoping that Brendan Rodgers can implement the same basic ideals that have worked so well for La Roja at international level. Whilst the Reds don’t have an Iniesta, a Xavi or even an Alonso *breaks down in tears*, they do have a number of players capable of keeping possession and, with a few smart signings this transfer window, there is no reason why the side can’t flourish in this more aesthetically pleasing brand of football. Although it would take a miracle of biblical proportions for them to enjoy a similar level of success that Spain have had over the past four years, they can, at least, lay down the blueprints to work from for the next decade or so.
Rodgers is a keen advocate of the Liverpool way, and has been very clear about his intention to re-establish the principles of pass and move football that the Reds were synonymous for during the 70s and 80s, and that Kenny Dalglish at least attempted to restore last season, whilst incorporating his more innovative, modern methods on to this timeless philosophy. His system is all about retaining possession using a slick passing style, with plenty of movement off the ball to create multiple passing avenues to the player in possession, and pressing high up the pitch when the opposition have the ball. This will be music to most of Liverpool’s players’ ears, with the exception of one man. Whilst Andy Carroll’s technical limitations are often overstated, to say he lacks the ability and sharpness to thrive in that sort of side is not doing him a great disservice; it takes a certain kind of player with a specific skill set to fit in to such a regimented system and, for all his strengths, finesse, mobility and technique are not the three things you most associate with him.
There is no question that Carroll can be extremely effective –even unplayable -if you play a more direct game, but that should not be to the detriment of other players in the side. Liverpool have plenty of technically gifted players who are capable of assimilating themselves in to Rodgers’ new system, and Carroll has not shown enough during his Liverpool career to suggest that he too can adapt. A spell of good form towards the end of last season and a promising showing at the European Champions cannot mask over the general poor level of performances since his move from Newcastle eighteen months ago. With him in the side, there is always the temptation to knock it long, particularly if things are going to plan, and perhaps that is something Rodgers is wary of. Whilst it is always important to have a plan b, for his system to work the players need to be fully invested in to it and believe in what they are working towards; if they just look for the route one pass at the first sign of trouble, the whole thing will be a disaster.
Rodgers is a keen advocate of the Liverpool way, and has been very clear about his intention to re-establish the principles of pass and move football that the Reds were synonymous for during the 70s and 80s
Whilst Rodgers was complimentary of Carroll as a player, he was noncommittal when asked whether the striker was a part of his future plans, fuelling speculation that he would be allowed to leave the club – be it temporarily or permanently – should they sign a suitable replacement. With a fee agreed for Roma’s Fabio Borini, the Reds are close to signing a forward that is a better fit in Rodgers’ tiki-taka system, so whether Carroll is now moved on remains to be seen. West Ham and AC Milan have been linked with loan moves for the Geordie, whilst other reports suggest Fulham are interested in signing him permanently in a part/ex deal, with Clint Dempsey, who has strongly been linked with a move to Liverpool, heading the other way.
On paper, a move to West Ham would be the best fit. Sam Allardyce likes a powerful target man to lead the line, and the more direct style of play would suit Carroll down to the ground (coincidentally, the place where the ball spends the least time for a Big Sam side). Plus, Uncle Kev Nolan could take Andy in again and look after him, like something out of the epic Sky One series ‘Dream Team’. Thanks to Twitter we all imagine Big Sam as the Don Barker type gaffer, so all we’d need then is Carlton Cole’s drink to get spiked in a nightclub, Karen Brady to get sent to jail for murder, and for Didier Baptiste to finally seal that long anticipated move to Liverpool! (Add your own comparisons in the comments.)
Milan seems the least likely destination of all the clubs mentioned. The Rossoneri are reportedly close to selling Thiago Silva and Zlatan Ibrahimovic to PSG for a combined £51m, meaning that not only would they be in the market for a striker, but they also have the finances to complete a permanent move – although initial reports suggest they’re after a loan deal. However, it is difficult to see the Reds allowing Carroll to move to Milan on loan after they decided against signing Alberto Aquilani permanently for the already cut-price of €6m last season. They do have a history of signing British forwards, with Luther Blissett, Joe Jordan and Mark Hateley all having donned the famous red and black shirt, but Carroll gets homesick enough when he only lives over the other side of the country, so it is unfathomable to envisage him moving to Italy.
Liverpool would struggle to reclaim even half of the fee they paid for Carroll should they try and sell him now, so it would be bad business to accept such a huge loss on a player who is still not at his peak
Still, in this instance, if Carroll is indeed not in Rodgers’ plans and a permanent move elsewhere is not forthcoming, then a loan move may prove beneficial for both club and player. Liverpool would struggle to reclaim even half of the fee they paid for Carroll should they try and sell him now, so it would be bad business to accept such a huge loss on a player who is still not at his peak. With four years left on his contract, it is unlikely that his value would depreciate any further should he go out on loan as he would be playing regularly, nor would the club be in a rush to sell him at the end of the loan – and if he goes on to have a successful loan spell regaining the form he showed at Newcastle, then Liverpool are in a much stronger position to sell next summer should they so chose. The potential reward outweighs the risk.
Regardless of the eventual outcome of this situation, Liverpool know that a loss will be made when they eventually get rid of Carroll. This is all about damage limitation, and ensuring that the same mistake is never made again. I have no doubt he will go on to be an important player for somebody, just not at Anfield. Sorry, Wor Andy, but it’s time to say Auf Wiedersehen, Pet!
If you liked this, check these out
Liverpool: After A Year In Lille, Has Anything Changed For Joe Cole?
Liverpool End Of Term Report: Sign De Jong And Ramirez And Forget Homegrown Dross
Liverpool: Steward Downing’s Hacked Wikipedia Page
West Ham Fans Are To Blame For The Home Form, Not Big Sam
West Ham: Big Sam’s Wham Bam Football Perfect For England
West Ham’s Bobby Moore: World Cup Winner And Comic Book Hero
Barcelona Greatest XI v AC Milan Greatest XI: Who Wins?
Arsenal Greatest XI v AC Milan Greatest XI: Who Wins?
AC Milan Hero: “I Left Cops For Dust In My Porsche.”
Click here for more articles about Football in Sabotage Times
Click here to follow Sabotage Times on Twitter
Click here to follow Sabotage Times on Facebook
If you like it, Pass it on
COMMENTS
The quicker he moves on the better. I don't care where as long as he goes. To think with 35 million we couldve got about ten players who probably were about 100 times better than him is sickening. For this alone KD deserved to b sacked.
KD was a very bad manager,honestly,he had no plan at all....he never had a plan B whentins were not going our way....and he was finally sacked,thank God for that..
You are all arseholes and don't have a clue about what being a football supporter really is, what football is about or what it's like to actually attend games in the flesh.
What worries me about trying to play like Barcelona is what Chelsea did to them in the CL! We have had problems with teams defending at Anfield with 10 men behind the ball for the last 5 years in there own half but now it will be in their own area! Spain still had players in their squad to change the way they play with Jesús Navas, Torres and Llorente making them more direct.
A spell of good form towards the end of last season and a promising showing at the European Champions cannot mask over the general poor level of performances since his move from Newcastle eighteen months ago! You say that but Carroll was injured for the first 6 months and then spent the next 6 months working on his fitness, stamina and his ball work which began to show in the last few months of the season, he was holding up and moving the ball with more purpose showing he his more then capable at adapting to a passing style of football which was mostly played with Kenny's team!
I'm surprised that anyone considered Kenny as having any eye for a player or any tactical awareness after Newcastle. Fuck sake, he appointed Fatty Barnes as Celtic manager after that and made them look slightly better after he was rapidly sacked. Hardly an achievement really.
What utter shite. Heres why, a physically big player always takes 9 or 10 games to get match fit unlike the smaller lads who get motoring 4 to 6 games in. AC didnt get that chance due to injury and while I agree his form was fair to poor when he came back, his play improved dramatically after he got the hook at Newcastle. Getting booed by the toon boys and a good old fashioned bollocking from KD proved to be the fulcrum point in his season. I can't see him leaving the club and nor do I want him to. The current rumours exist purely because of a media agenda to generate headlines from a loosely noncommittal remark from BR. I dont believe that AC is a poorer player than Danny Graham and he is more than capable of playing a more sophisticated style. Let's not forget he is young too. I'm really surprised at the naivety of the author. Lastly, LFC fans who write in and disrespect Kenny Dalglish should fuck off to "support" another club. Argue and discuss his management, fine, but have some respect for the man. Only Shankly did more for the club and the city.
Id give him another year cos you dont know exactly what is in store next season. Bored of reading about Carrol being crap anyway, easy target and no one has said anything original about him for about a year. Also, selling him now would be at a big loss so might as well gamble on him I think, albeit as a squad player.


RELATED








SABOTAGE





