Sabotage Times, We can't Concentrate so Why Should You?Sabotage Times, We can't Concentrate so Why Should You?

11

Pan Am: A Spectacular Crash

by John Rain
17 November 2011 12 Comments

With the stewardesses airbrushed like Barbie dolls and the pilots with the brain of Ken, Pan Am's outlandish script never takes off.

Pam Am is a period drama (these seem to be all the rage since modern life is so fucking depressing) set during the early 60s, or rather an alternate reality of the 1960s in which only thin, handsome people exist and all fat, ugly people were presumably banished to the underworld. This is an attempt at aspirational television, however it comes across like a drunk fish. Suffice to say; if you ever wondered what would happen if a bunch of Barbie dolls came to life and got hold of a pen, this is what they’d write. It’s vacuous, shallow and borderline offensive.

The whole show is a total and utter waste of time and the central message seems to be that stewardesses were really stupid in 1963 (but not as fuckwitted as the pilots). All of the stewardesses and pilots are so “glowing” that it looks like they were varnished and then baked like conkers before each shot. Christina Ricci (continuing her ongoing project of shrinking to the size of a tiny child) barely has a part, so I assume she was cast because she is the one actress who has a name that is bigger than her own body. A more dislikeable band of flying gobshites you are never likely to see.

The soundtrack is the first thing that irritates, it’s so patronising and annoying. With each twee piano note and sickly sweep of the strings, it feels like someone is telling you what the concept of music is as if you are a toddler. If this music ever came on in a lift, people would punch each other to death within seconds. I only saw it on TV and it made me want to kick my own teeth out.

The stewardess is then recruited as a top spy, which again feels like a drunk Barbie story come to life.

One thing that most American TV shows rely on heavily is a well chosen flashback. Pan Am just takes the total piss. It has four character flashbacks within the first 30 minutes, each as painful, dull and clumsily timed as the last. In one, a stewardess meets a man who works for American intelligence, and he asks if she finds that hard to believe. I would if I were her, anything associated with intelligence in this show would seem totally un-fucking-believable. The stewardess is then recruited as a top spy, which again feels like a drunk Barbie story come to life. Not to mention the fact that the plane she works on is piloted by two six-year-old boys in heat.

Pan Am also features some of the worst visual effects you are likely to see on television. The budget obviously couldn’t stretch to stock footage of old planes or helicopters, instead relying on visuals worthy of a shitty Playstation One game.

If you are after a virtual timewarp representation of life in the 1960s, seek out Mad Men. It is clever, funny and beautifully played - plus their flash backs have purpose and significance. If you are after the exact opposite, seek out Pan Am (idiot) - The televisual equivalent of nailing your own hand to your face. The biggest air disaster since…take your pick. Horrible.

Other recent stories you might like:

Who Can Replace David Attenborough?

Dear Jim, Please Stop Shane Richie Dancing On Your Grave This Christmas

Click here for more TV and Film stories

Click here to follow Sabotage Times on Twitter

Click here to follow Sabotage Times on Facebook

If you like it, Pass it on

image descriptionCOMMENTS

DBsKnees 2:25 pm, 17-Nov-2011

You ever worked in the airline industry mate? Judging by your pic I would assume not. I have family that have worked there and here are some observations I have made over the years: i) The majority of the pilots and cabin crew are 'beautiful people' (Pan Am would have been the prime example of this) ii) The majority of cabin crew / pilots are 1-dimensional, vacuous and superficial. iii) The majority of cabin crew / pilots are the sharpest tools in the box. iv) Although they don't openly admit it, most premium airlines are obsessed with image and the appearance of their crew. Of course I will be panned for generalising, being harsh and whatever but I have met a great deal of people working in this industry and I can tell you that Pan Am is pretty much spot on and the people it is aimed at - will love it.

NobbyStilesTeeth 2:41 pm, 17-Nov-2011

Hilarious. You have one line in there- "I only saw it on TV and it made me want to kick my own teeth out, " that made me think of Mike Tyson "makes me wish I'd bitten my own ears off."

Jimmy James Jameson 3:08 pm, 17-Nov-2011

Opening with a line such as "You ever worked in the airline industry mate? Judging by your pic I would assume not" is that a bit judgemental? Its a bit like me saying " Are you a raging homosexual? Judging by your campy defence of cabin crew, I suspect so." Just not on is it.

Stephen Tudor 7:20 pm, 17-Nov-2011

Brilliant. With one piece you've instantly become one of my favourite Sab Times writers.

devondame 11:25 pm, 17-Nov-2011

I love this program, it really highlights the difference between the 1960 Air Hostess and today's Crew. All I can say is good on you girls you made a difference and gave women some more of the independence they deserve

Nicola 12:05 am, 18-Nov-2011

So, just to clarify, dbsknees, being an airline industry expert, thinks pan am was spot on? It wasn't just the pan am employees who were improbably beautiful, Even the extras looked like the hollyoaks casting director had picked them out.

Chris Totty 12:28 am, 18-Nov-2011

I didn't watch Pan Am but just want to say how appalled I am at the rumour that this reviewer has never worked in the airline industry yet has the nerve to have an opinion about a programme he's watched.

Knappa 12:50 am, 18-Nov-2011

Good piece! (BTW - um, the first word is a typo!!)

HHalsad 8:02 pm, 20-Nov-2011

Oh Dear - maybe you should brush up on your own critical skills (typo - really?) before you judge the work of others.

Knappa 9:52 am, 21-Nov-2011

It's not a judgement - it's a fact - and I was trying to be polite as it's such a good piece. Thank you!!

The Cush 11:50 am, 21-Nov-2011

Back in '98 when i nailed my own hand to my face, i thought (besides 'this is fucking painful'), should i go for the other hand or try and find the television equivalent? I went with the latter, and now after all my years of searching...

johnnyw 1:47 pm, 21-Nov-2011

its why its called the idiot box 'cos only f*cking idiots ........

Leave a comment

TV image description SABOTAGE