Sabotage Times, We can't Concentrate so Why Should You?Sabotage Times, We can't Concentrate so Why Should You?


image description
image description
Life

Afghanistan: The Public Must Understand The Good The British Army Has Done

18

British Serviceman On The Sainsburys Ad: "Perhaps Some Subjects Should Be Left Alone"

by Jonathan Codd
14 November 2014 13 Comments

We've all seen the highly emotive Sainsbury's WWI Christmas ad, but is it fair for advertisers to use such a sad, mass loss of life to sell their products?

Tonight my attention was drawn to the Sainsbury’s 2014 Christmas advert. Whilst John Lewis opted for Monty the Penguin as their medium for inspiring good feeling and boosting sales, this supermarket took an entirely different approach.

If you’ve not seen it, then the basic premise is a reenactment of a series of unofficial cease-fires that took place in the week leading up to Christmas 1914, in one of the bloodiest conflicts humankind has ever endured, commonly referred to as World War One. Essentially in the week leading up to that Christmas, German and British troops began to sing together from their cold and war-torn trenches; this subsequently evolved to the exchanging of pleasantries and eventually physical meetings upon the land that separated them. Some reports have even suggested the occurrence of football matches and the exchanging of tokens such as food and jewellery. The advert can be found here.

Whichever way you look at it, this is incredibly poignant stuff. By that time, despite being at such an early stage of the war, thousands upon thousands of men had lost their lives in combat. To cease-fire and spend time conversing with the ‘enemy’, treating one another as fellow human beings, forgetting the ideologies of individuals and nations that had brought them there and united them in bloodshed, is truly inspiring stuff.

The Sainsbury’s advert is an three-minute representation of this. A lot of time has gone into the set construction, and it is evident that a considerable budget has been utilised to portray life as it was likely to have been (in terms of the terrain, uniform insignia and so forth). It is well filmed, well acted and really quite emotive. At the end of the advert, the soldiers return to their respective trenches and we see a German and a British soldier looking at the trinkets they have received from each other. Both look at the food they have received and smile delightfully, and the slogan ‘Christmas is for sharing’ appears.
Genuinely heartwarming.

But if you think a little deeper about this, the advert seems somewhat more sinister.

More…

Afghanistan: The Public Must Understand The Good The British Have Done

Colour Photographs From The Battlefields Of WWI

Sainsbury’s is a business. Pure and simple. They are not a charity, and so one has to look at what agenda they have in choosing to use this poignant moment in time as a means of advertising. The fact of the matter is, Sainsbury’s (or any other business) are not going to put out an advert unless it ultimately helps them to make money.

This is no way makes them bad in itself. Business is business.

However, I think perhaps that certain topics should remain off-limits when it comes to using them as vehicle to make a profit. The advert has been made in conjunction with the Royal British Legion, and whilst the RBL will undoubtedly have considered this very matter and decided they had a sufficient amount to gain from being in such a public spotlight, I can’t help but feel that endorsing their money-making advert with the RBL logo simply condones their actions; it somehow makes what they have done okay.

While I am not shallow enough to go and spend my money in Sainsbury’s as a result of their Christmas advert, I am sat here writing about it and so ultimately on some level they have achieved their aims, have they not? Any publicity is usually good publicity, after all.

There is no two ways about it, both World Wars saw a tragic, mass loss of life, quite unnecessarily if you boil the conflicts down to their basic building blocks, a debate I won’t go into further here. Following these conflicts, the world wanted to remember and this led to our yearly remembrance of the fallen, observed all around the world.

It used to be about remembering with great sadness our stupid acts in these wars. It used to be about being genuinely remorseful for what took place, vowing to never, ever let it happen again. But in recent years, with so much public support building for our troops around the world, it has almost become a celebration of the soldiers involved, a time to remember with pride, a time to be thankful for the fact that they gave their lives.

Operating under such a discourse, it is easy to see how the boundaries blur between what is acceptable advertisement material and what is not. After all, businesses already use sex, violence and other taboo issues to sell their products.

But surely using one of the bloodiest conflicts known to man is out of order? Surely it is an insult to the families of those who lost good men and women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives? Surely it makes a mockery of the great wounds left in the memories of nations all around the world?

Whatever your views are, the spirit of the advertisement is a good one – Christmas is for sharing. It has strong undertones of compassion for others, loving one’s neighbour, of doing good. And I’m all for that. I just think that perhaps some subjects should be left alone. Some subjects will always be of such significance, the associated events of such magnitude, that to use them for certain purposes must always be frowned upon.

If you like it, Pass it on

image descriptionCOMMENTS

Darryl 10:57 am, 14-Nov-2014

Similarly, how many extra copies of 'Pipes Of Peace' did McCartney shift when he used the same premise for its video?

Chris 11:49 am, 14-Nov-2014

War Horse. The Regeneration Trilogy. Blackadder. None of these were made purely for love. They were made to sell product - play, novels, TV programmes - and make money. However Sainsburys are actively raising money for the British Legion at the same time (as well as using their considerable advertising clout to raise awareness of the charity). My DVD of Blackadder Goes Forth and my copy of Regeneration doesn't.

Jon 2:12 pm, 14-Nov-2014

Chris I entirely agree, however I feel the point here that certain subjects should not be used as a means of gaining is a valid one. Sure, some good will come from the association with the RBL in terms of raising money for charity, but is that something Sainsbury's really give a stuff about, or is it simply a clever ploy to increase their own revenue whilst capitalising on a charity and all the good natured feeling associated with that?

mike 2:17 pm, 14-Nov-2014

Thanks for writing that Jonathan .You've expressed my feelings when I first saw this ad .I was absolutely appalled that anyone could use such an emotive subject to up their sales .I was instinctively haranguing the tv while my family just looked on in amazement . My sons had no idea that it was based on a real event .It's a case of anything goes now , if it increases sales !

Richard Luck 4:24 pm, 14-Nov-2014

Here's a preview of Sainsbury's second seasonal ad.

Richard Luck 4:24 pm, 14-Nov-2014

This time with the link... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82RTzi5Vt7w

Harry Paterson (@HarryPaterson1) 4:56 pm, 14-Nov-2014

I'm afraid that's the logic of capitalism. They commodify the imperial death cult and then sell it back to you to make a profit. Like this... http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/news/you-havent-remembered-until-youve-bought-a-tesco-remembrance-day-pizza-9851857.html

Andy 5:11 pm, 14-Nov-2014

@Harry. Distasteful as it may appear I really don't think the employees who made the pizza's are really that cynical - I think you are giving them way too much credit! I doubt they could spell imperial death cult let alone package it and use it as a marketing tool! Misguided they may be but masters of guerilla marketing they aren't - you've got to give them benefit of the doubt on this one!

Harry Paterson 9:23 am, 15-Nov-2014

Andy, the problem with the written word is that it sometimes falls short in conveying the writer's true feelings. In this case my tongue was probing my cheek. Or would have been had it not been full of that tasty pizza ;-)

Andy 3:12 pm, 15-Nov-2014

@so was mine mate! Just thinking of the thought process as they were doing it made me chuckle! Speak soon.

Martin willmott 10:14 pm, 15-Nov-2014

the sainsbury's ad is appropriate at this 100th anniversary, it portrays a true event which shows humanity over war and educates by those who don't know what happened asking questions and finding out about these remarkable events, a truly exceptional performance is a well made advert, good quality and taste, well done sainsburys.

Harry Paterson 8:55 pm, 17-Nov-2014

It's about as honest as a Lib Dem manifesto. Where's the blood? The agony? The terror? The sheer senseless and appalling waste? It's vile bollocks, actually. Carried by two unfeasibly chiselled models with not even a crease on their immaculate blood-and-shit free uniforms.

Jason Shepherd 8:36 pm, 21-Nov-2014

The ad is so very clean; obviously it isn't going to show the utter filth the troops had to endure. But hey, its for charity and as we know you can be a complete dick as long as you're raising money for charity.

Leave a comment

TV image description SABOTAGE

1